Tipton Takes Action to Block the Horrific EPA Water Grab

http://tipton.house.gov/press-release/tipton-takes-action-block-epa-water-grab

May 1, 2014 Issues: AgricultureConstitutional IssuesEconomy and JobsEnergy Environment and Public Lands

WASHINGTON—Congressman Scott Tipton (R-CO), today, joined his colleagues in pushing for the withdrawal of  a proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that could amount to the largest federal water grab to date. Tipton first raised concerns in March over the impact the rule could have in Colorado and on the rights of all water users.

The EPA’s proposed rule, which is subject to a 90-day comment period that ends on July 21, drastically expands the agency’s regulatory authority by redefining “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to include virtually every form of surface water.

In the letter addressed to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Army Secretary John M. McHugh, Tipton and his bipartisan colleagues wrote:

“…The rule is flawed in a number of ways. The most problematic of these flaws concerns the significant expansion of areas defined as “waters of the U.S.” by effectively removing the word “navigable” from the definition of the CWA.  Based on a legally and scientifically unsound view of the “significant nexus” concept espoused by Justice Kennedy, the rule would place features such as ditches, ephemeral drainages, ponds (natural or man-made), prairie potholes, seeps, flood plains, and other occasionally or seasonally wet areas under federal control.

Additionally, rather than providing clarity and making identifying covered waters “less complicated and more efficient,” the rule instead creates more confusion and will inevitably cause unnecessary litigation.  For example, the rule heavily relies on undefined or vague concepts such as “riparian areas,” “landscape unit,” “floodplain,” “ordinary high water mark” as determined by the agencies’ “best professional judgment” and “aggregation.”  Even more egregious, the rule throws into confusion extensive state regulation of point sources under various CWA programs.

In early December of 2013, your agencies released a joint analysis stating that this rule would subject an additional three percent of U.S. waters and wetlands to CWA jurisdiction and that the rule would create an economic benefit of at least $100 million annually.  This calculation is seriously flawed. In this analysis, the EPA evaluated the FY 2009-2010 requests for jurisdictional determinations – a period of time that was the most economically depressed in nearly a century.  This period, for example, saw extremely low construction activity and should not have been used as a baseline to estimate the incremental acreage impacted by this rule.  In addition, the derivation of the three percent increase calculation did not take into account the landowners who – often at no fault of their own – do not seek a jurisdictional determination, but rather later learn from your agencies that their property is subject to the CWA.  These errors alone, which are just two of many in EPA’s assumptions and methodology, call into question the veracity of any of the conclusions of the economic analysis.

Compounding both the ambiguity of the rule and the highly questionable economic analysis, the scientific report – which the agencies point to as the foundation of this rule – has been neither peer-reviewed nor finalized.  The EPA’s draft study, “Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence,” was sent to the EPA’s Science Advisory Board to begin review on the same day the rule was sent to OMB for interagency review.  The science should always come before a rulemaking, especially in this instance where the scientific and legal concepts are inextricably linked.

For all these reasons, we ask that this rule be withdrawn and returned to your agencies.  This rule has been built on an incomplete scientific study and a flawed economic analysis.  We therefore ask you to formally return this rule to your agencies.”

See the full letter HERE.

Tipton also joined his colleagues in a letter to House Appropriators last month requesting that no funds in the FY 2015 Energy and Water Development Appropriations and Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations bills be made available to implement the new EPA draft rule. Read that letter HERE.

Tipton has been a staunch defender of Colorado and Western water and private property rights since being elected to Congress. Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed Tipton’s legislation, with bipartisan support, to uphold state water law and protect private water rights from uncompensated federal takings.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s