But if/when Peyton Manning goes down, clutching his knees or ankles in the Super Bowl, after taking late hit after late hit, will this defense finally be exposed as the cowardly group that it’s appearing to be?

From: http://nflsoup.com/?p=1603

First, is it okay to publicly admit that your intentions aren’t just to defeat a team (or a passer), or merely rattle them, but more, to send them out on a stretcher?

And secondly, that this mildly coined “overly aggressive” defense is basically a group of misfits orchestrated by a savage play-caller who is merely calling out the dogs on the league’s top quarterbacks.

And to that, I ask, why isn’t (or hasn’t) the NFL taking action?

The Serious Lesson of an Affirmative Action President


Return to the Article
 

January 28, 2010

The Lesson of an Affirmative Action President

By James Lewis

You don’t pick brain surgeons by the color of their skin. You pick them by competence only. Same thing with airplane pilots. But we have allowed the profoundly irrational liberal media to persuade the American public that we are supposed to pick a U.S. president by affirmative action. Obama was elected to universal Hosannas because he is black. It wasn’t a secret. That’s why the Left around the world went into ecstasies when Obama ran and got elected.

We’ve been using affirmative action to hire and promote teachers and cops and to popularize movie stars and media heroes. We’ve had a generation of affirmative action agitprop, 24/7/365. Hillary Clinton was going to dictate racial and gender preferences for medical school admissions under HillaryCare. You can bet that reverse-racism is all over the 2,200 pages of ObamaCare. It’s reverse-racism forever!

In America today, competence is suspect, and incompetence gets all the attention. Yet competence is what keeps us alive.

Affirmative action was allowed by the Supreme Court as a temporary exception to the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution until blacks had the same
opportunities others did. It has now been about forty years, and the goal posts have just moved farther and farther Left. Today it’s not just blacks — it’s women, homosexuals, and illegal aliens. And it’s no longer equality of opportunity, but equality of outcome, which was the goal of Communism for seventy years in the Soviet Union, until the whole Soviet Empire crumbled as a result.

In the Soviet Union, everything was politicized. Incompetent people ran agriculture along Stalinist lines. Everything turned into a lie, and lies accelerated as they propagated through the system, in exactly the way the Climategate lies get worse and worse as they get passed along by politically correct bureaucrats and scientists. When political loyalty controls the outcomes, honesty and competence are driven out at every level of society. Nobody can point to Obama’s anti-terrorist policies and say that’s wildly incompetent — without fearing they will be accused of racism.

From a temporary policy to give black people a better chance in life, we have now arrived at a Marxist goal of universal equality for everyone — except for white, male, heterosexual, and excessively normal people. We have reversed racism, but guess what? Reverse-racism is still racism. As a direct result, corruption now pervades the big cities and Washington, D.C. That’s because race, gender, and victim status have taken over as the criteria for all the benefits society has to offer.

Obama’s election to the nation’s most powerful office is the direct outcome of racial reasoning. It was race that put him over the top against Hillary, in a thousand media endorsements, and finally, against John McCain, who was old, male and white. Three strikes against McCain, who for all his faults is vastly more experienced and knowledgeable than the Obamessiah.

Meanwhile, blacks are still suffering from the pervasive social pathology of the inner city — almost all self-inflicted, with the help of the welfare state. Europe shows exactly the same results, except that the victims of welfarism aren’t black, but mostly white and Muslim immigrants. American blacks today are more bitter and more racially enraged than ever before, after forty years of affirmative action. Affirmative action hasn’t helped women, who now have to work two jobs, one at home and one for income, especially because so many men have walked away from their families under liberal cultural values. Reverse-racism has actively hurt generations of children, who have grown up in broken homes as a direct result of pernicious social policies which Obama has actually tried to make worse. One of the first things he did was to reverse Clinton’s welfare reform so that social pathology in the black community can spread its poison even wider and deeper. Obama isn’t good for black people — but then, blacks consistently vote for those who do them the most harm.

Reverse-racism has hurt Asian-Americans, who don’t usually count as disadvantaged non-whites, but who by dint of talent and hard work are now among the largest ethnic groups in many colleges and universities and a majority at Berkeley and UCLA, where race engineering is banned by a California law passed by voters over the objection of the political establishment.

Any time a Muslim tries to explode a bomb on an airplane, Obama sticks his nose in the air and pretends he doesn’t know what’s up. But he knows, he knows. The next time an airplane blows up in flight, Obama will be history, but he will never blame himself for his own truly stupid and perverse policies. On the contrary, Obama will be around for the next forty years blaming White America for his own folly.

We’ve now been taught by the media to hire and elect people by the color of their skin, or by gender, or by sexual preferences — including, in the case of Kevin Jenkins, their ability to peddle gay sexuality to kids and teachers for the Queering of the Elementary Schools.

Is it any surprise that a president who ran as the historic first black — that is, on affirmative action grounds — is not just incompetent, but perverse, so that we deliberately don’t check the passenger lists for young Muslim males who were brought up in radicalized cultures, even if they are already in the terror database, even if they buy a one-way ticket with untraceable cash and don’t check any luggage at all on their one-way flights from Nigeria to Detroit?

Obama’s anti-terror policies are not just incompetent. They are suicidal.

They are exactly like all the other social policies that are supposed to help the poor, the disadvantaged, the black, females, homosexuals — all of which invariably end up punishing and degrading the very people they are supposed to help. Who do you suppose is in the teachers’ unions that are keeping black kids from escaping the inner city ghettos? Yes, it’s black and liberal teachers. Who do you suppose is actively importing Muslim radicals into Europe and the United States? Who do you suppose has done more to spread HIV? Yes, it is the very Leftists who are always telling us how much compassion they feel for those very people.

The vote in 2008 was even crazier than picking your brain surgeon by the color of his skin. If the knife slips in the surgeon’s hand, you might die, but the nation as a whole doesn’t. But if the president has a nervous breakdown in the Oval Office, the whole world is at risk. It’s a mad, mad, mad idea to elect people on the basis of race or gender.

We have been so PC-whipped as a nation that Obama’s election as a black man — not as a competent black man, not as an experienced and well-qualified black man — was celebrated by liberals and Leftists around the world. It is the victory of brain-dead ideology over common sense. The guy in the White House today is potentially the most dangerous, mentally fixated, and irresponsible demagogue we have ever known. Those wacky ideas are once again on the rise, not just in the schools and colleges, but even at the very centers of power. The election of Obama was by far the screwiest thing American voters have ever done. It throws doubt on the whole American experiment, because we have inflicted this disaster on ourselves.

The lesson of the Obama presidency is exactly the opposite of what our stuck-on-stupid media are telling us. It is that we must never, ever hire, promote, or elect somebody to a position of power and responsibility merely because of his race. Abraham Lincoln would not have been surprised. Neither would Martin Luther King, Jr. Even the editors of the New York Times choose schools for their kids not by race, but by educational competence. Somehow the American people have forgotten their common sense while Obama was rifling their wallets.

The captain is drunk in the deckhouse, and the ship of state is heading for the rocks. Our enemies are trying to take advantage of our failure to elect even sensible leadership. If you don’t think al-Qaeda, Ahmadinejad, and the Russians will try to screw us royally under this perverse and incompetent leadership, just wait a month or two. The Chinese have taken the measure of this guy. So have the other jackals prowling around the small campfire of civilization. They know he’s a pushover, and they will act accordingly. The only question is how badly we’ll get burned.

The Left have advocated suicidal policies, and now they have found their way to power. But ultimately this is a failure of the American people, of our pathetic excuse for a media, and of the anti-American hatred that pervades the Left.

Yes, God protects orphans, widows, and the United States. But you can rely on pure dumb luck for only a little while before the ship of state comes to grief on that unforgiving iceberg.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/the_lesson_of_an_affirmative_a.html at January 30, 2010 – 04:56:41 PM CST

High unemployment, the recession and a terrorist resurgence in Afghanistan are bad enough. But there are a number of problems on the horizon that could dwarf President Obama’s first-year trials.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/28/we-aint-seen-nothing-yet//print/

Saturday, November 28, 2009
We ain’t seen nothing yet

Victor Davis Hanson

When it comes to the problems facing this country, an old slogan comes to mind: “You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet.”

High unemployment, the recession and a terrorist resurgence in Afghanistan are bad enough. But there are a number of problems on the horizon that could dwarf President Obama’s first-year trials.

Why the pessimism? In short, we are doing nothing to prepare for the crises to come.

A global recession has led to low oil prices. Yet in this window of opportunity, America has not decreased its foreign-oil dependence. We are not encouraging domestic exploration. And we are still ambivalent on nuclear power.

But as the world economy recovers, oil will probably surge back over $100 a barrel, increasing our oil import tab by 25 percent or more. The Obama administration, though, mostly is obsessed with subsidizing relatively small amounts of wind and solar power. It likely won’t be long before angry motorists at the pump are demanding to know why we have not pushed for more development at home of still-plentiful natural gas and oil fields.

Meanwhile, other economic bad news may be just around the corner. Today, interest rates on short-term Treasury bills still are less than 1 percent. But they, too, will climb as business picks up and worries over American inflation spread.

If we have to pay foreign lenders 5 percent to 7 percent interest on our debt, as in the past, the increased costs will gobble up additional billions from our annual budget. Yet sadly again, we are missing this rare opportunity of low interest to pay off cheaply the trillions that we already owe. Instead, we are borrowing even more!

The war on terror is also heating up again. Fairly or not, the Fort Hood massacre sent the message that the United States is more worried about appearing politically correct in matters of diversity than hunting down radical Islamists on its home soil. Those who seek to copy what happened at Fort Hood will be encouraged. And those charged with stopping them discouraged and confused.

Such uncertainty was reinforced by the attorney general’s optional decision to try the architects of the Sept. 11 attacks in federal courts in New York City. At best, the confessed mass-murderer Khalid Shaikh Mohammed will lecture the United States. At worst, one sympathetic juror could find the monster only 99 percent guilty, and therefore the court might fail to convict him of planning the murders of 3,000 innocent people.

After announcing a new strategy of counter-insurgency in March and appointing Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal the new supreme commander in Afghanistan, it looks as though Mr. Obama only now will commit more troops to Afghanistan. That will be a wise decision – but one coming three months after the general’s request.

We were given an unexpected reprieve through the defeat of al Qaeda in Iraq. We can now build on that victory by routing the Taliban in the way the Iraq surge stabilized democracy there.

Finally, there is an array of taxes on the horizon – increased federal income tax rates; promised hikes in health care surcharge taxes; and even rumors of value-added federal sales taxes. These increases are said to be aimed at the proverbial wealthy. But that could change – given that the top 5 percent of households already provide 60 percent of the nation’s income-tax revenue. And many are already paying 50 percent to 60 percent of their incomes in combined local, state, federal and payroll taxes.

Just consider: The price of gas will soon likely increase. The cost of servicing our profligate borrowing will, too. One more terrorist attack like at Fort Hood, or nightly sermons from a grandstanding Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, or a new Taliban offensive, and the momentum could shift to radical Islam in their decades-long war against the United States. Next year’s tax hikes will be real and large – and no longer just this year’s idle talk.

As these storm clouds gather, Congress bickers on Saturday nights about borrowing even more money for health care reform, yet another federal entitlement.

If you thought things have been rough so far, hang on, ’cause you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

Soft on Terror

http://article.nationalreview.com/423236/soft-on-terror/charles-krauthammer
January 29, 2010 12:00 A.M.

Soft on Terror
Islamist terrorism is not a law-enforcement issue.

The real scandal surrounding the failed Christmas Day airline bombing was not the fact that a terrorist got on a plane — that can happen to any administration, as it surely did to the Bush administration — but what happened afterward when Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was captured and came under the full control of the U.S. government.

After 50 minutes of questioning him, the Obama administration chose, reflexively and mindlessly, to give the chatty terrorist the right to remain silent. Which he immediately did, undoubtedly denying us crucial information about al-Qaeda in Yemen, which had trained, armed, and dispatched him.

We have since learned that the decision to Mirandize Abdulmutallab had been made without the knowledge of or consultation with (1) the secretary of defense, (2) the secretary of homeland security, (3) the director of the FBI, (4) the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, or (5) the director of national intelligence (DNI).

The Justice Department acted not just unilaterally, but unaccountably. Obama’s own DNI said that Abdulmutallab should have been interrogated by the HIG, the administration’s new High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group.

Perhaps you hadn’t heard the term. Well, in the very first week of his presidency, Obama abolished by executive order the Bush-Cheney interrogation procedures and pledged to study a substitute mechanism. In August, the administration announced the establishment of the HIG, housed in the FBI but overseen by the National Security Council.

Where was it during the Abdulmutallab case? Not available, admitted National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, because it had only been conceived for use abroad. Had not one person in this vast administration of highly nuanced sophisticates considered the possibility of a terror attack on American soil?

It gets worse. Blair later had to explain that the HIG was not deployed because it does not yet exist. After a year! I suppose this administration was so busy deploying scores of the country’s best lawyerly minds on finding the most rapid way to release Gitmo miscreants that it could not be bothered to establish a single operational HIG team to interrogate at-large miscreants with actionable intelligence that might save American lives.

Travesties of this magnitude are not lost on the American people. One of the reasons Scott Brown won in Massachusetts was his focus on the Mirandizing of Abdulmutallab.

Of course, this case is just a reflection of a larger problem: an administration that insists on treating Islamist terrorism as a law-enforcement issue. Which is why the Justice Department’s other egregious terror decision, granting Khalid Sheikh Mohammed a civilian trial in New York, is now the subject of a letter from six senators — three Republicans, two Democrats, and Joe Lieberman — asking Attorney General Eric Holder to reverse the decision.

Lieberman and Sen. Susan Collins had written an earlier letter asking for Abdulmutallab to be turned over to the military for renewed interrogation. The problem is, it’s hard to see how that decision gets reversed. Once you’ve read a man Miranda rights, what do you say? We are idiots? On second thought . . .

Hence the agitation over the KSM trial. This one can be reversed and it’s a good surrogate for this administration’s insistence upon criminalizing — and therefore trivializing — a war on terror that has now struck three times in one year within the United States, twice with effect (the Arkansas killer and the Fort Hood shooter) and once with a shockingly near miss (Abdulmutallab).

On the KSM civilian trial, sentiment is widespread that it is quite insane to spend $200 million a year to give the killer of 3,000 innocents the largest propaganda platform on earth, while at the same time granting civilian rights of cross-examination and discovery that risk betraying U.S. intelligence sources and methods.

Accordingly, Sen. Lindsey Graham and Rep. Frank Wolf have gone beyond appeals to the administration and are planning to introduce a bill to block funding for the trial. It’s an important measure. It makes flesh an otherwise abstract issue — should terrorists be treated as enemy combatants or criminal defendants? The vote will force members of Congress to declare themselves. There will be no hiding from the question.

Congress may not be able to roll back the Abdulmutallab travesty. But there will be future Abdulmutallabs. By cutting off funding for the KSM trial, Congress can send Obama a clear message: The Constitution is neither a safety net for illegal enemy combatants nor a suicide pact for us.

— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group

© National Review Online 2010. All Rights Reserved.

Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama Is Inviting the Next Attack

http://www.amazon.com/Courting-Disaster-America-Barack-Inviting/dp/1596986034/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_1

White House speechwriter Marc Thiessen was locked in a secure room and given access to the most sensitive intelligence when he was tasked to write President George W. Bush’s 2006 speech explaining the CIA’s interrogation program and why Congress should authorize it. Few know more about these CIA operations than Thiessen, and in his new book, Courting Disaster, he documents just how effective the CIA’s interrogations were in foiling attacks on America, penetrating al-Qaeda’s high command, and providing our military with actionable intelligence. Thiessen also shows how reckless President Obama has been in shutting down the CIA’s program and releasing secret documents that have aided our enemies. Courting Disaster proves:

How the CIA program thwarted specific deadly attacks against the U.S.
Why “enhanced interrogation” was not torture by any reasonable legal or moral standard
How the information gained by “enhanced interrogation” could not have been acquired any other way
How President Obama’s actions since taking office have left America much more vulnerable to attack

In chilling detail, Thiessen reveals how close the terrorists came to striking again, how intelligence gained from “enhanced interrogation” repeatedly stymied their plots, and how President Obama’s dismantling of this CIA program is inviting disaster for America.

Sound the alarm! Call your Congressmen daily to protest their renewed efforts to force Obamacare down our throats.

The Pelosi-HarryReid-care monstrosity is rising again from the fetid swamp today (Jan 28) as statist Congressmen are attempting to force it through the Senate, then the House, on a 51% vote reconciliation strategy that’s only supposed to be used in rare tax-adjustment bills.

Congress House or Senate (877)-210-5351, (800) 828-0498, (866) 220-0044, (202) 225-3121, (202) 224-3121, 1-877-221-8211(PIN) 91294, White House comment line 202-456-1111

http://www.healthreformscam.com/2010/01/26/pelosi-and-reid-plot-secret-plan-to-pass-obamacare/

”Too Big to Fail” was a farce

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0208/opinions-steve-forbes-fact-comment-too-big-to-fail-fails_print.html

”Too Big to Fail” Fails
02.08.10, 12:00 AM ET

Playing to populist passions and trying to raise desperately needed cash, the Obama Administration wants to impose a big, new tax on the nation’s largest financial institutions, particularly investment banks such as Goldman Sachs. The levy will supposedly reimburse taxpayers for losses suffered in the financial and auto industry bailouts under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). But the tax is also an implicit fee on large institutions for being covered under the government’s “too big to fail” policy. That’s why the tax will be based on the size of a financial institution’s assets minus insured deposits and shareholder equity. (Retail deposits are already covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.)

Of course, politics intrudes: The auto companies themselves are exempt from this so-called fee, even though their bailouts will cost more than $50 billion. After all, why upset the unions to which the Administration has already awarded these companies? Investment giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, still beloved by big-spending Washington politicians, are also exempt. In fact, on Christmas Eve the Treasury Department quietly removed the ceiling on how much money these twins can get from the government.

Putting aside the fact that it’s foolish to impose any tax on the financial system when the economy remains shaky, and that the levy will fall heaviest on those institutions (most of which didn’t want the money in the first place) that have paid back their TARP injections with interest, this proposal also ignores the difficult question of whether we should even have a “too big to fail” policy. Such a principle is a formula for future disaster if the financial system is explicitly divided between a handful of behemoths, which will not be allowed to go broke, and everyone else. Innovation often comes from small firms, but they will be at a decided disadvantage in such a suffocating environment.

Government backstops are an invitation to recklessness and overleveraging, which is why the Administration wants to impose a new array of regulations and to have a big say in Wall Street pay packages. Washington is firmly convinced that it was compensation formulas–the desire to make big bucks quickly, regardless of the consequences–that brought us to the current sorry pass.

Of course, a gold-based monetary policy; an end to government-sponsored enterprises (Fannie and Freddie should be recapitalized, broken up and privatized); no more government interference in such areas as the housing market (the Federal Housing Administration is still guaranteeing mortgages with down payments of only 3.5%); and no more mark-to-market accounting rules applied to financial institutions’ regulatory capital would, together, prevent future financial panics such as the one we recently experienced. But we must also credibly repudiate the whole notion of “too big to fail.” A number of ideas are floating around on how this might be done, particularly regarding special bankruptcy provisions for large financial entities. A commission should be tasked with studying this issue and coming up with recommendations, which shouldn’t be too difficult. The Lehman Brothers failure would probably not have sparked a panic had it not been for mark-to-market accounting rules, which led to devastating bear raids on banks and life insurers. The fears over AIG’s counterparties to its credit default swaps are now increasingly looking to have been needlessly overblown.

The January report by the Independent Congressional Oversight Panel of TARP made it clear why we must rid ourselves of “too big to fail”: “Belief remains widespread in the marketplace that, if the economy once again approaches the brink of collapse, the federal government will inevitably rush in to rescue financial institutions deemed too big to fail. This belief distorts prices, giving large financial institutions an advantage in raising capital.… These implicit guarantees also encourage major financial institutions to take unreasonable risks.”

Forbes Magazine February 8, 2010

The Fruit of Feminism

January 26, 2010
Forty Years of Feminism Now Bearing Fruit
By Pamela Geller

A new documentary, Oral Sex Is the New Goodnight Kiss, chronicles America’s moral decay. Sharlene Azam, a Canadian filmmaker, says, “If you talk to teens [about oral sex], they’ll tell you it’s not a big deal. In fact, they don’t consider it sex. They don’t consider a lot of things sex.” In the documentary, teenage girls talk casually about their sexual experiences and even their forays into prostitution.

One girl sums up the new attitudes: “Five minutes and I got $100. If I’m going to sleep with them anyway because they’re good-looking, might as well get paid for it, right?”

Azam said that this was going on in good homes right under parents’ noses: “The prettiest girls from the most successful families [are the most at risk]. We’re not talking about marginalized girls. [Parents] don’t want to know because they really don’t know what to do. I mean, you might be prepared to learn that, at age 12, your daughter has had sex, but what are you supposed to do when your daughter has traded her virginity for $1,000 or a new bag?”

This is the bitter fruit of forty years of feminist domination in the United States.

Virtue, self-worth, and man’s moral value are DOA in the age of the cultural domination of the left. What an awful stench this decaying corpse gives off, lying in a smoldering, fetid pile of ash.

This is how the phony feminist movement empowered women? Girls selling the it for a handbag? Those men-hating parasites have ruined the glorious exaltation of women in 20th-century America. I know. I grew up in it. All one has to do is watch movies from the forties, fifties, and sixties (before the left culture rout) to catch a glimpse of the status of women. We were then formidable, respected, treasured, and above all…revered. It was as good as it gets.

Azam’s vulgar and depressing documentary is no surprise. The atmosphere is already poisoned by the left’s attitudes toward teenage sex. And these attitudes come out everywhere. Two weeks ago, in Crosby Middle School in Hitchcock, Texas, a member of the Hitchcock school board, Shirley Price, gave what was supposed to be a motivational talk to sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade girls. Instead, she gave a graphic, smut-filled rant about oral and anal sex.

I am sickened by this — not because I am prudish, but because it speaks volumes about how girls view themselves and their roles, not to mention the ever-increasing diminishing of women in American society.

To say that feminism was one of the worst things to happen to women is being easy. It has been worse for men. The demon seeds of the “liberation” movement are everywhere — including the epidemic of single motherhood, the breakdown of the American family, the street vernacular of “bitches and hos,” the emasculation of men, and the bone-crushing responsibility of single moms acting as mother, father, breadwinner, chief cook, and bottle-washer.

And what has Obama done about all this? He has appointed Kevin Jennings, the founder of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network), to be his Safe Schools Czar. GLSEN is notorious for having sponsored a conference at Tufts University at which teenagers were given instruction in an array of risky and dangerous sexual practices. Obama has appointed this radical to head up America’s “safe schools,” but who is going to keep kids safe from him? This is another terrible Obama choice. Whatever one’s sexual preferences or proclivities may be, do not traumatize children. Why can’t the schools just teach reading, writing, arithmetic — and civics?

But this is no surprise, of course. A breakdown of sexual mores and a flouting of convention is part and parcel of the agenda in every society to which socialism has come.

Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be lefties.

Every child in America, all 73.7 million of them, should be kept safe from the leftist inculcation of the public school curriculum. Taxpayer money should be used to help set up home-schooling networks and resources across the country.

We spend more per capita on education than virtually every other nation, and yet we rank close to the bottom in math and science — so busy are our children being force-fed global warming junk science, the LGBT agenda, a whitewashed Muhammad, and other assorted propaganda.

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/forty_years_of_feminism_now_be.html

This is how the left has been destroying America since they took over in the ’60s. Now the teenage girls in Azam’s documentary are reaping what the left has been sowing for decades.

Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs website and is former associate publisher of the New York Observer. She is the author (with Robert Spencer) of the forthcoming book The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America (Simon & Schuster).

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/forty_years_of_feminism_now_be.html at January 26, 2010 – 03:45:21 PM CST

Thank you to the best commentary web site in the world: AmericanThinker.com

This is just an insignificant e-mail expressing significantly heart felt gratitude (from a 55 year old husband and father of 5) for all the wisdom and the product you provide, advancing, defending and upholding a conservative worldview at Americanthinker.com.

I’ve been returning to your site 7 days a week for at least 3 years (and via RSS) and I can’t believe there’s so much insight to be gained, even though the breadth of topics stays appropriately within a narrow range and just a half dozen articles daily. But there’s at least one zinger piece to digest every day.

My browser (Maxthon) is configured to receive hundreds of RSS feeds (have to stay up on Thomas Sowell, Mark Steyn, Dennis Prager, Jonah Goldberg, and Charles Krauthammer!) and it’s well organized for quick access to hundreds of valuable commentary/aggregator sites (like Hot Air, Real Clear Politics, National Review, Big Government)….but no site or blog compares with American Thinker.

None.

You all are an American treasure and I’m really thankful for you. If I had a way to promote your site (other than constantly copying/referencing articles from it on climber.wordpress [no original content]) I would take the opportunity because it’s such a powerful intellectual organ in a country (including most Conservatives) that’s losing its desire, will and ability to think and debate. You are upholding America’s heritage of meaning-filled words, literature, investigation, journalism and principles which has been so diminished by the anti-intellectual, anti_theocentric, propagandistic, demagogic secularism dominating most of the educational/entertainment/governmental/legal/media venues and institutions.

Desperately fighting for our founding principles*, with you,

* I signed the Manhattan Declaration: http://www.manhattandeclaration.org which draws a consequential line in the sand on 3 foundational issues, the first one for which I’ve already paid a price for peacefully blocking access to abortion clinics; a mere foretaste of what will be required in the near future for those who won’t compromise these unalienable rights and principles.

1. the sanctity of human life
2. the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife
3. the rights of conscience and religious liberty.

One great week: Massachusetts goes Republican, Obamacare dies and the Supreme Court unshackles the First Amendment.

Krauthammer Quips: ‘Best Week I’ve Had Since Spring Break in Medical School’
By Brent Baker (Bio | Archive)
Fri, 01/22/2010 – 20:03 ET

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2010/01/22/krauthammer-quips-best-week-ive-had-spring-break-medical-school

Quip of the day, from columnist Charles Krauthammer on Friday’s (January 22) Special Report with Bret Baier on FNC. Baier wondered: “Conservatives, pretty good week?” Krauthammer affirmed:

You know, this is an amazing week. Massachusetts goes Republican, health care dies and the Supreme Court unshackles the First Amendment. It’s the best week I’ve had since spring break in medical school — and I don’t even remember it [laughter from other panelists].

And there was another item which you mentioned: Air America, the liberal talk show network went out of business — which is a redundancy because nobody was listening anyway.

In his latest column, “What Scott Brown’s win means for the Democrats” published in Friday’s Washington Post, Krauthammer observed how “both wings of American liberalism — congressional and mainstream media” have been in denial:

The reason both wings of American liberalism — congressional and mainstream media — were so surprised at the force of anti-Democratic sentiment is that they’d spent Obama’s first year either ignoring or disdaining the clear early signs of resistance: the tea-party movement of the spring and the town-hall meetings of the summer. With characteristic condescension, they contemptuously dismissed the protests as the mere excrescences of a redneck, retrograde, probably racist rabble.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2010/01/22/krauthammer-quips-best-week-ive-had-spring-break-medical-school#ixzz0dV1VGg4P